top of page

From Site Visit to Repair Plan: Better Structural Repair Documentation With ArcSite

3 days ago
4 min read

A successful structural repair begins long before carbon fiber, structural epoxy, or repair materials arrive at the jobsite. It begins with accurate information from the field.


Missing dimensions, unclear photographs, incomplete sketches, and unidentified crack locations can slow down an engineering review and create additional questions for the contractor. When project information is captured clearly during the first site visit, the structure can be evaluated more efficiently and the proposed repair can be developed around the actual field conditions.

Hand using tablet to edit a site plan outdoors on grass, with app menus and Export Drawing panel showing DWG and Send to Building Inspector

To help contractors document projects more effectively, Structural Reinforcement Solutions has partnered with ArcSite, a mobile drawing and estimating platform designed for contractors working in the field.


ArcSite logo and Structural Reinforcement Solutions logo

Why Field Documentation Matters in Structural Repair


An engineer or technical specialist reviewing a structural repair cannot rely on one close-up photograph of a crack or a rough measurement written in an email. The individual signs of distress must be considered in relation to the dimensions, construction, geometry, restraint, loading, and overall condition of the structure.


Depending on the application, useful field information may include:


  • Overall wall, beam, slab, column, or structural-member dimensions

  • Crack locations, lengths, widths, and visible patterns

  • Bowing, leaning, deterioration, or exposed reinforcing steel

  • Openings, corners, transitions, and adjoining structural elements

  • Existing construction materials and known reinforcement

  • Member spans, support conditions, and bearing locations

  • Photographs connected to identifiable locations on the drawing

  • Equipment, utilities, finishes, or other installation obstructions

  • Interior and exterior site-access conditions

  • Known loading changes or proposed changes in use


Organizing this information into a measured field drawing gives everyone involved a common reference. Contractors can show what they observed, engineers can identify missing information more quickly, and repair details can be coordinated with fewer assumptions.


Tablet screen showing SRS Repair Project floor plan with carbon fiber repair markers, room labels, rulers, and a Products sidebar

Capturing the Structure During the First Site Visit


A good field record does not need to begin as a formal engineering drawing. It needs to communicate the structure accurately enough for the next person reviewing the project to understand the conditions without standing at the site.


A practical documentation process includes:


  1. Establish the overall layout of the structure or repair area.

  2. Record the dimensions needed to understand the scale and geometry.

  3. Mark cracks, deterioration, bowing, and other visible distress in their actual locations.

  4. Attach photographs and notes to the areas they represent.

  5. Identify openings, corners, supports, obstructions, and access limitations.

  6. Record the existing construction and any information available about embedded reinforcement.

  7. Document known loading conditions, proposed equipment, or planned changes in use.

  8. Export and organize the information for project review.


This approach is especially useful on retaining walls, foundation walls, parking structures, columns, slabs, beams, bridge components, and other projects where the relationship between multiple conditions may affect the repair design.



Creating Measured Field Drawings With ArcSite


ArcSite allows contractors to create scaled drawings from a phone or tablet while they are on site. Measurements, photographs, notes, forms, and markups can be organized around the drawing instead of being spread across separate notebooks, text messages, and camera folders.


For structural repair contractors, that can create a clearer record of the project before information is sent to SRS or the project engineer. The drawing can establish the overall geometry, while attached photographs and annotations provide detail about individual areas of concern.


ArcSite also supports data collection, material takeoffs, estimates, proposals, and collaboration between field and office teams. Contractors can carry organized site information forward instead of recreating the project record after returning to the office.


Contractors can explore ArcSite through the SRS partner page and review the available drawing and field-documentation tools.




Turning Field Information Into an SRS Project Review


ArcSite helps capture and organize field information; it does not replace structural evaluation or project-specific engineering. The value comes from giving the engineer and technical team a clearer starting point.


When submitting a project to SRS, contractors can provide the measured drawing together with photographs, member dimensions, crack locations, deterioration details, existing plans, proposed loading, and other available project information. SRS engineers and specialists can then review the application and help identify the appropriate strengthening approach, materials, layout requirements, and technical support needed for the project.


If additional information is required, a clearly organized drawing makes those questions easier to answer. Instead of trying to describe an unidentified wall section or photograph over the phone, the contractor and reviewer can refer to the same marked location.


Two SRS Structural proposal pages showing crack injection epoxy pricing, technical data tables, and a concrete crack photo.

From Engineering Review to Customer Proposal


Accurate documentation also improves communication beyond the engineering review. A measured drawing can help the contractor explain the observed conditions, show the proposed repair areas, calculate material quantities, and develop a clearer proposal for the property owner, facility manager, or general contractor.


The same project record can support communication between the field crew, office staff, engineer, material supplier, and customer. That continuity helps reduce duplicated work and keeps important site information connected to the project as it moves from assessment to repair.


A More Organized Structural Repair Workflow


Structural repair projects often involve more coordination than the finished installation reveals. Site conditions must be documented, the cause and extent of the distress must be evaluated, the repair must be designed, materials must be identified, and field installation must follow the approved details.


Better field documentation does not eliminate those steps. It connects them.


By combining ArcSite’s field-drawing tools with SRS project review and engineering support, contractors can create a more organized path from the first site visit to the completed repair—beginning with information that is easier to understand, share, and act upon.



Comments


bottom of page